Core i5-540UM vs Pentium Dual-Core E2210

Intel

Core i5-540UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2210

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-540UM vs Pentium Dual-Core E2210 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-540UM vs Pentium Dual-Core E2210 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-540UM vs Pentium Dual-Core E2210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-540UM

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Pentium Dual-Core E2210 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,002 vs 1,005).

Pentium Dual-Core E2210

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $98 MSRP, while Core i5-540UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-540UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2210 better than Core i5-540UM?
    Yes. Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual-Core E2210 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $98 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-540UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i5-540UM vs Pentium Dual-Core E2210 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i5-540UM

    The Core i5-540UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $250.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual-Core E2210

    The Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-540UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual-Core E2210's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-540UM versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2210 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2210 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-540UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2210 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-540UM scores 1,002 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2210's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Dual-Core E2210. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-540UM vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2210.

    FeatureCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2210
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2.2 GHz+10%
    Base Clock
    1.2 GHz
    2.2 GHz+83%
    L3 Cache
    3 MB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    1 MB (total)+100%
    Process
    32 nm-29%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Arrandale (2010−2011)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    1,002
    1,005
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-540UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2210 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2210
    Socket
    BGA1288
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    800
    Max RAM Capacity
    8
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: true (Core i5-540UM) / not specified (Pentium Dual-Core E2210). The Core i5-540UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2210 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-540UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.

    FeatureCore i5-540UMPentium Dual-Core E2210
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    true