Core i5-6260U
VS
Core i7-2715QE

Core i5-6260U vs Core i7-2715QE

Intel

Core i5-6260U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-2715QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-6260U is positioned at rank 406 and the Core i7-2715QE is on rank 1118, so the Core i5-6260U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6260U

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
98%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
550%
#395
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
542%
#396
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
498%
#397
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
495%
#398
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
491%
#400
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
474%
#401
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
455%
#402
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
454%
#403
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
442%
#406
Core i5-6260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2715QE

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3444%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3393%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3115%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3101%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3073%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2967%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2845%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2840%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2764%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
100%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
96%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-6260U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2715QE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-6260UCore i7-2715QE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-6260UCore i7-2715QE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-6260U and Core i7-2715QE

Intel

Core i5-6260U

The Core i5-6260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,200 points. Launch price was $304.

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Core i5-6260U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2715QE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2715QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-6260U versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2715QE (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-6260U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2715QE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-6260U scores 3,200 against the Core i7-2715QE's 3,221 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-2715QE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 979 vs 587, a 50.1% lead for the Core i5-6260U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i5-6260U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2715QE.

FeatureCore i5-6260UCore i7-2715QE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,200
3,221
Geekbench 6 Single
979+67%
587
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-6260U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2715QE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6260U versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2715QE — the Core i5-6260U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6260U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-6260U) vs 16 (Core i7-2715QE) — the Core i7-2715QE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-U (Core i5-6260U) and QM67,HM65 (Core i7-2715QE).

FeatureCore i5-6260UCore i7-2715QE
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Iris Graphics 540 (Core i5-6260U) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2715QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6260U targets Mainstream Laptop, Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i5-6260U rivals A12-9720P; Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore i5-6260UCore i7-2715QE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Graphics 540
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Embedded/Industrial