A10-7800 vs Core i5-6260U

A10-7800 vs Core i5-6260U Performance Spectrum

A10-7800

4 / 4

3,213

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-6260U

2 / 4

3,200

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7800 vs Core i5-6260U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7800 vs Core i5-6260U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7800

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-6260U.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-6260U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,200 vs 3,213).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7800.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7800 better than Core i5-6260U?

Yes. A10-7800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7800 still makes the most sense overall. A10-7800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-6260U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7800 vs Core i5-6260U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7800

The A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,213 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-6260U

The Core i5-6260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,200 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7800 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-6260U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10-7800 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-6260U — a 29.4% clock advantage for the A10-7800 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A10-7800 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-6260U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7800 scores 3,213 against the Core i5-6260U's 3,200 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-7800. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 452 vs 979, a 73.7% lead for the Core i5-6260U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-7800	Core i5-6260U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+34%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+94%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,213	3,200
Geekbench 6 Single	452	979+117%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7800 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7800) vs 12 (Core i5-6260U) — the A10-7800 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A70M,A75,A78,A88X (A10-7800) and Skylake-U (Core i5-6260U).

Feature	A10-7800	Core i5-6260U
Socket	FM2+	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7800) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6260U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7800) and Iris Graphics 540 (Core i5-6260U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7800 targets Budget, Core i5-6260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7800 rivals Core i3-4150; Core i5-6260U rivals A12-9720P.