Radeon R7 A10-7800
VS
Radeon R7 A8-8650

Radeon R7 A10-7800 vs Radeon R7 A8-8650

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7800

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is positioned at rank 488 and the Radeon R7 A8-8650 is on rank 309, so the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800

#477
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2276%
#479
2063%
#480
2058%
#484
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1871%
#485
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1858%
#487
100%
#488
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
100%
#489
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#490
99%
#491
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#492
99%
#493
98%
#494
95%
#495
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
94%
#498
Radeon R8 M535DX
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#499
Radeon R5 230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $25
93%
#500
GeForce 9300 GE
MSRP: $23|Avg: $25
93%
#501
Mobility Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
92%
#502
Radeon HD 8650G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-8650

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
95%
#299
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
740%
#301
671%
#302
669%
#306
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
608%
#307
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
604%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
100%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
97%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
97%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
96%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
94%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-8650.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $30 for the Radeon R7 A10-7800, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 45.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+45.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7800 and Radeon R7 A8-8650

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7800

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-8650

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 scores 740 and the Radeon R7 A8-8650 reaches 719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 825 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
G3D Mark Score
740+3%
719
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3840+900%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
35.87 TFLOPS+5561%
0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2335 MHz+183%
825 MHz
ROPs
96+1100%
8
TMUs
240+900%
24
L1 Cache
768 KB+700%
96 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 draws 180W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
TDP
180W
30W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
72
Perf/Watt
4.1
24.0+485%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49 and now averages $20. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) vs 36.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 45.7% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7800Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP
$155
$49-68%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$20-33%
Performance per Dollar
24.7
36.0+46%
Codename
Navi 32
Opal
Release
September 11 2024
January 9 2014
Ranking
#131
#890