GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A8-8650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A8-8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
11920.4% HIGHER MSRP
$5,890 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,841 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11739.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (730 vs 719), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A8-8650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,841 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $5,890, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11739.3% (14.7 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-8650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P4-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Radeon R7 A8-8650 reaches 719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon R7 A8-8650
G3D Mark Score	730+2%	719
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+662%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+43%	825 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+700%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon R7 A8-8650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-8650. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon R7 A8-8650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon R7 A8-8650
TDP	225W	30W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	72
Perf/Watt	3.2	24.0+650%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-1Q came in at $5890, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-8650 was 99.2% cheaper ($5841 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 14600% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-1Q (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP	$5890	$49-99%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	14.7+14600%
Codename	GM204	Opal
Release	August 30 2015	January 9 2014
Ranking	#525	#890

Search GRID P4-1Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A8-8650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.