
GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro 1100M

GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:

Quadro 1100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-1Q is positioned at rank 413 and the Quadro 1100M is on rank 165, so the Quadro 1100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 1100M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 1100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-1Q.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | Quadro 1100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 1100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-1Q and Quadro 1100M

GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

Quadro 1100M
The Quadro 1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 755 points. Launch price was $109.94.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Quadro 1100M reaches 755 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro 1100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 384 (Quadro 1100M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro 1100M).
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Quadro 1100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 730 | 755+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+790% | 0.5422 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+2300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Quadro 1100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P4-1Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 1100M has 4 GB. The Quadro 1100M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 1100M) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Quadro 1100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Quadro 1100M's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro 1100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 350W (Quadro 1100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Quadro 1100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 16.8+425% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Quadro 1100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5890 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $185 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GK107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #525 | #856 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











