GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800

GRID P4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7800

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3700% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,890 MSRPvs$155 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
  • 25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Radeon R7 A10-7800

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,735 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3752.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($155 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (740 vs 730), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A10-7800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,735 cheaper on MSRP at $155 vs $5,890, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3752.1% (4.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7800

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2335 MHz.

FeatureGRID P4-1QRadeon R7 A10-7800
G3D Mark Score
730
740+1%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2048
3840+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
35.87 TFLOPS+643%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
2335 MHz+98%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
128
240+88%
L1 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-1QRadeon R7 A10-7800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7800. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-1QRadeon R7 A10-7800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P4-1QRadeon R7 A10-7800
TDP
225W
180W-20%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
3.2
4.1+28%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-1Q came in at $5890, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A10-7800 was 97.4% cheaper ($5735 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers 4700% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7800 (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P4-1QRadeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP
$5890
$155-97%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
4.8+4700%
Codename
GM204
Navi 32
Release
August 30 2015
September 11 2024
Ranking
#525
#131

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.