GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K1000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K1000M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (756 vs 730), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P4-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K1000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Quadro K1000M reaches 756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K1000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1,536 (Quadro K1000M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M).

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Quadro K1000M
G3D Mark Score	730	756+4%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+104%	2.369 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Quadro K1000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P4-1Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K1000M) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Quadro K1000M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K1000M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro K1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 350W (Quadro K1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Quadro K1000M
TDP	225W	100W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	3.2	7.6+137%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID P4-1Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Quadro K1000M
MSRP	$5890	—
Codename	GM204	GK104
Release	August 30 2015	July 23 2013
Ranking	#525	#562

Search GRID P4-1Q on Amazon

Search Quadro K1000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.