GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K420

GRID P4-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K420

2014Core: 771 MHzBoost: 784 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K420 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3826.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,890 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.

Quadro K420

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,740 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3805.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (730 vs 726), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K420 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,740 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $5,890, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3805.2% (4.8 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K420 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P4-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-1Q vs Quadro K420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K420

The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Quadro K420 reaches 726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1,344 (Quadro K420). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 784 MHz.

FeatureGRID P4-1QQuadro K420
G3D Mark Score
730
726
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+52%
1344
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+129%
2.107 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+50%
784 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
768 KB+586%
112 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-1QQuadro K420
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P4-1Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K420 carries 1 GB. Quadro K420 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K420. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K420) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-1QQuadro K420
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K420's 108W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 350W (Quadro K420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P4-1QQuadro K420
TDP
225W
108W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
3.2
6.7+109%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-1Q came in at $5890, while the Quadro K420 launched at $150. On MSRP, Quadro K420 was 97.5% cheaper ($5740 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 4.8 (Quadro K420) — the Quadro K420 offers 4700% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-1Q (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID P4-1QQuadro K420
MSRP
$5890
$150-97%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
4.8+4700%
Codename
GM204
GK104
Release
August 30 2015
July 22 2014
Ranking
#525
#475

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.