GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon HD 6670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon HD 6670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon HD 6670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P4-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5849.5% HIGHER MSRP
$5,890 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($5,890 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6670

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,791 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5808.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $5,890 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P4-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (730 vs 725), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P4-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,791 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $5,890, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5808.7% (7.3 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P4-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon HD 6670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P4-1Q

The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

Radeon HD 6670

The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon HD 6670
G3D Mark Score	730	725
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+79%	2.703 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+34%	880 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+33%	96
L1 Cache	768 KB+300%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon HD 6670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P4-1Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P4-1Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon HD 6670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon HD 6670
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	3.2+10%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P4-1Q came in at $5890, while the Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670 was 98.3% cheaper ($5791 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) — the Radeon HD 6670 offers 7200% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-1Q (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GRID P4-1Q	Radeon HD 6670
MSRP	$5890	$99-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	7.3+7200%
Codename	GM204	Cayman
Release	August 30 2015	December 14 2010
Ranking	#525	#596

Search GRID P4-1Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.