
GRID P4-1Q vs Radeon HD 6670

GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-1Q is positioned at rank 413 and the Radeon HD 6670 is on rank 172, so the Radeon HD 6670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $99 (vs $185), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 85.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+85.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($185) | ✅More affordable ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-1Q and Radeon HD 6670

GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 730 | 725 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+79% | 2.703 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+34% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P4-1Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+10% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890 MSRP and currently averages $185, while the Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99 and now averages $99. The Radeon HD 6670 costs 46.5% less ($86 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) — the Radeon HD 6670 offers 87.2% better value. The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5890 | $99-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $185 | $99-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.9 | 7.3+87% |
| Codename | GM204 | Cayman |
| Release | August 30 2015 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #525 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













