GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GRID P4-1Q
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:
GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is positioned at rank 409 and the GRID P4-1Q is on rank 413, so the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID P4-1Q is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GRID P4-1Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-1Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 285M SLI holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $185), it costs 78% less, resulting in a 365% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+365%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($185) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID P4-1Q
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.
GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734 | 730 |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+53% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI costs 78.4% less ($145 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) — the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers 371.8% better value. The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-78% | $185 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.4+372% | 3.9 |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | GM204 |
| Release | March 2 2009 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #753 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID P4-1Q
