
GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GRID K140Q

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:

GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is positioned at rank 409 and the GRID K140Q is on rank 197, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K140Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 285M SLI holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1160.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1160.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285M SLI and GRID K140Q

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the GRID K140Q reaches 728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734 | 728 |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+53% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 1.5 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers 1126.7% better value. The GRID K140Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $125 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-92% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.4+1127% | 1.5 |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | GK104 |
| Release | March 2 2009 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #753 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















