
GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is positioned at rank #409 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 A8-7650K remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R7 A8-7650K

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7650K
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 757 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the Radeon R7 A8-7650K reaches 757 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734 | 757+3% |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0)+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 70-26% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 25.2+414% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A8-7650K costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs Infinity (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7650K offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A8-7650K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | Opal |
| Release | March 2 2009 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #753 | #890 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















