GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro K420
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:
Quadro K420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is positioned at rank 409 and the Quadro K420 is on rank 220, so the Quadro K420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K420 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K420 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 97.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Quadro K420
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.
Quadro K420
The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the Quadro K420 reaches 726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the Quadro K420 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 1,344 (Quadro K420).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734+1% | 726 |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1344+425% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K420 has 1 GB. The Quadro K420 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro K420's 108W — a 32.6% difference. The Quadro K420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 108W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 6.7+37% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K420 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 36.3 (Quadro K420) — the Quadro K420 offers 97.3% better value. The Quadro K420 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.4 | 36.3+97% |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | GK104 |
| Release | March 2 2009 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #753 | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Quadro K420
