GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6670
2010Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734+1% | 725 |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1536+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 285M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6670). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs None (Radeon HD 6670). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6670).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 75-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+69% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 6670 (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | Cayman |
| Release | March 2 2009 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #753 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















