
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A10-7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is positioned at rank 409 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 is on rank 488, so the GeForce GTX 285M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2009). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $40 for the GeForce GTX 285M SLI, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 34.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+34.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon R7 A10-7800

GeForce GTX 285M SLI
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 734 | 740 |
| Architecture | G9x | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 3840+1400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+20% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.4 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers 34.2% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $155 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.4 | 24.7+34% |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | Navi 32 |
| Release | March 2 2009 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #753 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















