GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro 1100M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

2009Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 1100M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro 1100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro 1100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro 1100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

2009

Why buy it

  • 85.4% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Quadro 1100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 285M SLI across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 85.4% in average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 1100M instead at 755 vs 734, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 1100M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 1100M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 285M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro 1100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 734 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 1100M

The Quadro 1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 755 points. Launch price was $109.94.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI scores 734 and the Quadro 1100M reaches 755 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M SLI is built on G9x while the Quadro 1100M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 384 (Quadro 1100M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285M SLIQuadro 1100M
G3D Mark Score
734
755+3%
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 1100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285M SLIQuadro 1100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 1100M carries 4 GB. Quadro 1100M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 285M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro 1100M.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285M SLIQuadro 1100M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 285M SLI draws 150W versus the Quadro 1100M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro 1100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro 1100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285M SLIQuadro 1100M
TDP
150W
45W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
4.9
16.8+243%