GRID K140Q vs GRID P4-1Q
GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K140Q is positioned at rank 197 and the GRID P4-1Q is on rank 413, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K140Q.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P4-1Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P4-1Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $185 (vs $500), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 171% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+171%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($185) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K140Q and GRID P4-1Q
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the GRID P4-1Q reaches 730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728 | 730 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+111% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the GRID P4-1Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID P4-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (GRID P4-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GRID K140Q launched at $125 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890 and now averages $185. The GRID P4-1Q costs 63% less ($315 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.5 (GRID K140Q) vs 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) — the GRID P4-1Q offers 160% better value. The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | GRID P4-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125-98% | $5890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $185-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 3.9+160% |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #628 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K140Q and GRID P4-1Q
