
GRID K140Q

Radeon HD 6670
GRID K140Q vs Radeon HD 6670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K140Q vs Radeon HD 6670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID K140Q vs Radeon HD 6670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K140Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌26.3% HIGHER MSRP$125 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.
Radeon HD 6670
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K140Q vs Radeon HD 6670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728 | 725 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K140Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K140Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K140Q) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 11.2 (11_0)+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q) vs None (Radeon HD 6670). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 3.0.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3rd Gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID K140Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+10% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K140Q came in at $125, while the Radeon HD 6670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670 was 20.8% cheaper ($26 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (GRID K140Q) vs 7.3 (Radeon HD 6670) — the Radeon HD 6670 offers 25.9% better value. The newer card here is GRID K140Q (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125 | $99-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 7.3+26% |
| Codename | GK104 | Cayman |
| Release | June 28 2013 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #628 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














