GRID K140Q
Radeon R7 A10-7800
GRID K140Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K140Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K140Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K140Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
Radeon R7 A10-7800
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌24% HIGHER MSRP$155 MSRPvs$125 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($155 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K140Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728 | 740+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+1467% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K140Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7800. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 4.1+28% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K140Q came in at $125, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155. On MSRP, GRID K140Q was 19.4% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (GRID K140Q) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the GRID K140Q offers 20.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7800 (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125-19% | $155 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8+21% | 4.8 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #628 | #131 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K140Q and Radeon R7 A10-7800
