GRID K140Q vs Radeon R7 A10-7800
GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A10-7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K140Q is positioned at rank 197 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 is on rank 488, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Radeon R7 A10-7800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID K140Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K140Q.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $500 for the GRID K140Q, it costs 94% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1594.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1594.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K140Q and Radeon R7 A10-7800
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728 | 740+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+1467% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 4.1+28% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K140Q launched at $125 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 launched at $155 and now averages $30. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 costs 94% less ($470 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.5 (GRID K140Q) vs 24.7 (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 offers 1546.7% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125-19% | $155 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $30-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 24.7+1547% |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #628 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K140Q and Radeon R7 A10-7800
