GRID K140Q vs Quadro K420
GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Quadro K420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K140Q is positioned at rank 197 and the Quadro K420 is on rank 220, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K140Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K420 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K420 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2393.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2393.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K140Q and Quadro K420
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Quadro K420
The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the Quadro K420 reaches 726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro K420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 1,344 (Quadro K420). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 728 | 726 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+14% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+9% | 2.107 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+14% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K140Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K420 has 1 GB. The Quadro K420 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K420's 108W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (Quadro K420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 108W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 6.7+109% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K140Q launched at $125 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Quadro K420 launched at $150 and now averages $20. The Quadro K420 costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.5 (GRID K140Q) vs 36.3 (Quadro K420) — the Quadro K420 offers 2320% better value. The Quadro K420 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K140Q | Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $125-17% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $20-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 36.3+2320% |
| Codename | GK104 | GK104 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #628 | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K140Q and Quadro K420
