GRID K140Q vs Quadro K600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K140Q vs Quadro K600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K140Q vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K140Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $74 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
59.2% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$125 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K140Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (728 vs 722), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K140Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K140Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $74 cheaper on MSRP at $125 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 60.5% (5.8 vs 3.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID K140Q vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K140Q

The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K140Q scores 728 and the Quadro K600 reaches 722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K140Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K140Q) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600).

Feature	GRID K140Q	Quadro K600
G3D Mark Score	728	722
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2880+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	5.196 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	128	240+88%
L1 Cache	128 KB	240 KB+88%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K140Q	Quadro K600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K140Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 carries 1 GB. Quadro K600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K140Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K600. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Quadro K600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K140Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K600's 225W — a 0% difference. The Quadro K600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K140Q) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Quadro K600
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	3.2	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K140Q came in at $125, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199. On MSRP, GRID K140Q was 37.2% cheaper ($74 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (GRID K140Q) vs 3.6 (Quadro K600) — the GRID K140Q offers 61.1% better value.

Feature	GRID K140Q	Quadro K600
MSRP	$125-37%	$199
Performance per Dollar	5.8+61%	3.6
Codename	GK104	GK110B
Release	June 28 2013	July 23 2013
Ranking	#628	#318

Search GRID K140Q on Amazon

Search Quadro K600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.