
GRID P4-1Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 730A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-1Q is positioned at rank 413 and the GeForce GT 730A is on rank 370, so the GeForce GT 730A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 730A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-1Q.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 730A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 730A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $185), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 841.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+841.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($185) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-1Q and GeForce GT 730A

GRID P4-1Q
The GRID P4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 730 points.

GeForce GT 730A
The GeForce GT 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 743 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-1Q scores 730 and the GeForce GT 730A reaches 743 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GT 730A uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 768 (GeForce GT 730A). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-1Q) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730A). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 657 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 730 | 743+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+378% | 1.009 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+79% | 657 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+1100% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-1Q) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 730A) — the GRID P4-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-1Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 730A's 55W — a 121.4% difference. The GeForce GT 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-1Q) vs 350W (GeForce GT 730A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 55W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 13.5+322% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-1Q launched at $5890 MSRP and currently averages $185, while the GeForce GT 730A launched at $75 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 730A costs 89.2% less ($165 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.9 (GRID P4-1Q) vs 37.1 (GeForce GT 730A) — the GeForce GT 730A offers 851.3% better value. The GRID P4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID P4-1Q | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5890 | $75-99% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $185 | $20-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.9 | 37.1+851% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #525 | #813 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















