RADEON IGP 320
AMD
G3D Mark
4
MSRP
$100
AVG Price
$20
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Overview
The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320
FPS Benchmarks
Predicted performance for RADEON IGP 320 across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 7800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Baldur's Gate 3
Counter-Strike 2
Destiny 2
Dota 2
Final Fantasy XIV
Honkai: Star Rail
League of Legends
Left 4 Dead 2
Path of Exile 2
Project Zomboid
Technical Analysis
Detailed breakdown of RADEON IGP 320 specifications and capabilities.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark (the standard measure of rasterization GPU performance), placing it in the Entry Level tier as a Aging generation graphics card. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) architecture (codename: Navi 21), manufactured on a 7 nm process— smaller process nodes improve power efficiency and transistor density. It packs 4608 shader units (the primary compute units for rendering pixels), 288 TMUs (texture mapping units), and 128 ROPs (render output units that handle final pixel output). Raw FP32 compute power: 20.28 TFLOPS — this measures the theoretical peak floating-point performance. Boost clock reaches 2200 MHz from a base of 1825 MHz.
| Specification | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|
| G3D MarkPassMark 3D graphics benchmark score | 4 |
| ArchitectureGPU microarchitecture generation | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| CodenameInternal GPU die codename | Navi 21 |
| Manufacturing ProcessFabrication node — smaller = more efficient | 7 nm |
| Shader UnitsCore compute units for rendering/compute | 4608 |
| TMUsTexture Mapping Units — handle texture sampling | 288 |
| ROPsRender Output Units — final pixel/color blending | 128 |
| Boost ClockMaximum GPU frequency under load | 2200 MHz |
| Base ClockGuaranteed minimum GPU frequency | 1825 MHz |
| Compute (FP32)Peak single-precision floating-point performance | 20.28 TFLOPS |
| Texture Fill RateTextures processed per second | 633.6 GTexel/s |
| PCIe InterfaceCPU↔GPU data link generation | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Transistor Count | 26,800 million |
| Performance RankPosition in global GPU performance ranking | #136 |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON IGP 320 is equipped with 0.5 GB of GDDR5 video memory connected via a 64-bit memory bus. Memory operates at 8 Gbps effective speed.
| Specification | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|
| VRAM SizeVideo memory capacity — more = better for high-res textures | 0.5 GB |
| VRAM TypeMemory technology generation | GDDR5 |
| Memory BusWidth of data path — wider = more bandwidth | 64-bit |
| Memory SpeedEffective memory data rate | 8 Gbps |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB |
Advanced Features & APIs
The RADEON IGP 320 supports modern upscaling and frame generation technologies: Radeon Super Resolution — these can dramatically boost effective FPS by generating intermediate frames or upscaling from lower internal resolution.
| Specification | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|
| Radeon Super Resolution | ✅ Supported |
Display & Media
Display outputs: .
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300 Watt under load (TDP) — a 350W PSU minimum is recommended. Power connector: Legacy.
| Specification | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|
| TDPPower consumption under load | 300 Watt |
| Recommended PSUMinimum power supply wattage | 350W |
| Power ConnectorRequired PCIe power cable type | Legacy |
Value Analysis
At an average price of $20 (MSRP: $100). Overall performance ranking position: #136 among all indexed GPUs.
| Specification | RADEON IGP 320 |
|---|---|
| MSRPManufacturer's Suggested Retail Price | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d)Average market price over the last 30 days | $20 |
| Performance RankPosition in global GPU performance ranking | #136 |
| Release Date | November 4 2021 |
| Release Year | 2021 |
Specifications Reference
Raw spec sheet for quick lookup. The analysis cards above explain what these fields mean in practice.
2 categories
Technical Specifications
22 specs
Technical Specifications
22 specs
| ROPs | 128 |
| TMUs | 288 |
| Vram | 0.5 GB |
| L0 Cache | 1.1 MB |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Core Clock | 1825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Memory Speed | 8 Gbps |
| Shading Units | 4608 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Memory Bus Width | 64-bit |
| Transistor Count | 26,800 million |
| Frame Generation | Radeon Super Resolution: Yes |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 |
| Texture Fill Rate | 633.6 |
| Manufacturing Process | 7 nm |
| Driver Upscaling Tech | Radeon Super Resolution (RSR) |
| Power Consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt |
| Floating Point Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS |
General Information
4 specs
General Information
4 specs
| Codename | Navi 21 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| Release Date | November 4 2021 |
| Performance Ranking Position | 136 |
Similar Performance
Graphics cards with benchmark scores closest to the current hardware, grouped by manufacturer.
NVIDIA (8)
AMD (8)
Our Recommendation for RADEON IGP 320
Suggested pairings based on performance balance
Minimum (Avoid Bottleneck) (12)
Recommended (Balanced) (12)
High-End (Max Performance) (12)
Popular Comparisons
Compare RADEON IGP 320 with other popular GPUs
Compare RADEON IGP 320
See how this GPU stacks up against similar alternatives
Better Alternatives (8)
Similar or Lower Performance (8)
