RADEON 7200 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 7200 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 7200 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 7200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 32% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅RADEON 7200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 more expensive on MSRP at $100 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 32% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON 7200 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 7200

The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7200 scores 3 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 7200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 7200) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 7200	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+2479%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	2200 MHz+115%
ROPs	8	128+1500%
TMUs	24	288+1100%
L1 Cache	0.09 MB	1 MB+1011%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	4 MB+2977%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7200	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON 7200 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 7200) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 7200	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	4 MB+2977%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7200 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The RADEON 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 7200	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	50W-83%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 7200 came in at $99, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON 7200 was 1% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (RADEON 7200) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	RADEON 7200	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$99-1%	$100
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	Polaris 24	Navi 21
Release	May 13 2019	November 4 2021
Ranking	#898	#136

Search RADEON 7200 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.