RADEON 7200 vs Radeon IGP 320M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 7200 vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 7200 vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 7200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon IGP 320M

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅RADEON 7200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon IGP 320M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon IGP 320M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon IGP 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 7200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 7200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon IGP 320M has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON 7200 vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 7200

The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7200 scores 3 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the Radeon IGP 320M leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 7200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 7200) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 7200	Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+307%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	1250 MHz+22%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	2 MB+1438%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7200	Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON 7200 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 7200) vs 2 MB (Radeon IGP 320M) — the Radeon IGP 320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 7200	Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	2 MB+1438%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON 7200	Radeon IGP 320M
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 7200) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Comp vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 7200) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon IGP 320M).

Feature	RADEON 7200	Radeon IGP 320M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Motion Comp	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7200 draws 50W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The RADEON 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7200) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.