Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7200

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON 7200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Buy on Amazon

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7200 Performance Spectrum

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
0.5 GB 10
4
+33.3%
brand logoRADEON 7500
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9000
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT
RADEON 7200
0.5 GB 50
3
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 370
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

RADEON 7200

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON 7200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 7200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 7200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 7200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON 7200

The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the RADEON 7200's 3 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 7200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 384 (RADEON 7200). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+42%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 128-bit on the RADEON 7200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 128 KB (RADEON 7200) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 7.0 (RADEON 7200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
DirectX
8.1+16%
7.0
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.4+8%
1.3
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs None (RADEON 7200). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs MPEG-2 Motion Comp. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 7200).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
Encoder
N/A
None
Decoder
MPEG-2
MPEG-2 Motion Comp
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the RADEON 7200's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON 7200). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
TDP
10W-80%
50W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70
70
Perf/Watt
0.4+300%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 came in at $0, while the RADEON 7200 launched at $99. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.0 (RADEON 7200) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 7200 (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 7200
MSRP
$0-100%
$99
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.0
Codename
Broadway
Polaris 24
Release
January 7 2010
May 13 2019
Ranking
#846
#898
Search MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 on AmazonSearch RADEON 7200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.