
GeForce4 MX 440SE

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 440SE is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 25W vs 10W.
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 25W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 440SE leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+12% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+188% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce4 MX 440SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE and 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | N/A |
| Decoder | No | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 85.7% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 165mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 10W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 165mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-14% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 MX 440SE came in at $0, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Broadway |
| Release | August 1 2020 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #523 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














