
GeForce 6200A

GeForce4 MX 440SE
GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 MX 440SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 MX 440SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 MX 440SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6200A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌32% higher power demand at 33W vs 25W.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce 6200A is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 440SE is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 33W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 168mm, a 3mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 MX 440SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 440SE leads by 25%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 MX 440SE uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 896+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+346% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1575 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200A has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 440SE carries 512 MB. GeForce4 MX 440SE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c+29% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1+62% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs No (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Decoder: PureVideo vs No.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce4 MX 440SE's 25W — a 27.6% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 25W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 165mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 60°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6200A came in at $0, while the GeForce4 MX 440SE launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs Infinity (GeForce4 MX 440SE) — the GeForce4 MX 440SE offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GM108 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #810 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














