GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9000

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9000

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200A

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
  • 2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 120% higher power demand at 33W vs 15W.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

  • +25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 33W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
4
5+25%
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+722%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2900 MHz+208%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 75% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9000
TDP
33W
15W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.3+200%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200A came in at $0, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce 6200A was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9000
MSRP
$0-100%
$49
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.1
Codename
GM108
Strix Point
Release
March 13 2015
July 15 2024
Ranking
#810
#312

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.