
GeForce 256

GeForce 6200A
GeForce 256 vs GeForce 6200A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 256 vs GeForce 6200A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 256 vs GeForce 6200A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 256
2019Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce 6200A is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 256 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 33W, a 23W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce 6200A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌230% higher power demand at 33W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 256 vs GeForce 6200A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 256
The GeForce 256 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 256 scores 5 versus the GeForce 6200A's 4 — the GeForce 256 leads by 25%. The GeForce 256 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 6200A uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 256) vs 384 (GeForce 6200A). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 256) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5+25% | 4 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+10% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz+10% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 192 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 256 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200A carries 128 MB. GeForce 256 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 256 and 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 256) vs 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) — the GeForce 6200A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce 256) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6200A). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 9.0c+29% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 2.1+75% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 256) vs No (GeForce 6200A). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Comp vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 256) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Comp | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 256 draws 10W versus the GeForce 6200A's 33W — a 107% difference. The GeForce 256 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 256) vs 350W (GeForce 6200A). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 165mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-70% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 165mm | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+400% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 256 came in at $199, while the GeForce 6200A launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce 6200A was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce 256) vs Infinity (GeForce 6200A) — the GeForce 6200A offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 256 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce 6200A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108B | GM108 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #643 | #810 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














