GeForce 256 vs RADEON IGP 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 256 vs RADEON IGP 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 256 vs RADEON IGP 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 256

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅RADEON IGP 350M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 256 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 55W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON IGP 350M

2016

Why buy it

✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌450% higher power demand at 55W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON IGP 350M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 20% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 5), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 256 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 256 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RADEON IGP 350M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 256 vs RADEON IGP 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 256

The GeForce 256 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON IGP 350M

The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 256 scores 5 versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 6 — the RADEON IGP 350M leads by 20%. The GeForce 256 is built on Pascal while the RADEON IGP 350M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 256) vs 512 (RADEON IGP 350M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 256) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M).

Feature	GeForce 256	RADEON IGP 350M
G3D Mark Score	5	6+20%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	144 KB+13%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 256 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 256	RADEON IGP 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 256 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 350M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 256) vs 256 KB (RADEON IGP 350M) — the GeForce 256 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 256	RADEON IGP 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 256 draws 10W versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 55W — a 138.5% difference. The GeForce 256 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 256) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 256	RADEON IGP 350M
TDP	10W-82%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	165mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.5+400%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 256 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce 256	RADEON IGP 350M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GP108B	Cape Verde
Release	February 20 2019	July 6 2016
Ranking	#643	#667

Search GeForce 256 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 350M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.