
GeForce 256

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
GeForce 256 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 256 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce 256 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 256
2019Why buy it
- ✅MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 256 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌895% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
2010Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1094% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 256 vs MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 256
The GeForce 256 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 256 scores 5 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP's 6 — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP leads by 20%. The GeForce 256 is built on Pascal while the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 256) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 256) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+40% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+80% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 256 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 256 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 256) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) — the GeForce 256 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce 256) vs 7.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 256 draws 10W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 256 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 256) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-80% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-14% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+400% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 256 came in at $199, while the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP launched at $20. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP was 89.9% cheaper ($179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce 256) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP) — the MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 256 (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $20-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Codename | GP108B | Broadway |
| Release | February 20 2019 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #643 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














