
GeForce 256

GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce 256 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 256 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 256 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 256
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 450W, a 440W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 7).
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce4 Ti 4400
2022Why buy it
- ✅+40% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.3% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌4400% higher power demand at 450W vs 10W.
- ❌30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 256 vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 256
The GeForce 256 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4400
The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 256 scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 leads by 40%. The GeForce 256 is built on Pascal while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 256) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 256) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 7+40% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 16384+4167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS+10259% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 2520 MHz+143% |
| ROPs | 16 | 176+1000% |
| TMUs | 24 | 512+2033% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 16 MB+11329% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 72 MB+14300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 256 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4400. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 256) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 72 MB+14300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce 256) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 256) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Comp vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 256) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Comp | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 256 draws 10W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 191.3% difference. The GeForce 256 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 256) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-98% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 256 came in at $199, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce 256 was 33.4% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce 256) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4400 (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce 256 | GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-33% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GP108B | AD102 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #643 | #4 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














