GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200A

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 250W, a 217W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌657.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 33W.
❌28.6% longer card at 216mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6200A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 6200A has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
G3D Mark Score	4	6+50%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	1.345 TFLOPS+86%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	24	60+150%
L1 Cache	192 KB	960 KB+400%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4800 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce 6200A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
DirectX	9.0c+11%	8.1
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	2.1+62%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: PureVideo vs No.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
TDP	33W-87%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	216mm
Height	100mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200A came in at $0, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 6200A was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce 6200A offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200A (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP	$0-100%	$399
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.0
Codename	GM108	GF100
Release	March 13 2015	March 26 2010
Ranking	#810	#488

Search GeForce 6200A on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.