GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

362700%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

348450%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

344400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343800%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343100%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

341150%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

336850%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

335600%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

332500%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

331600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

327600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326900%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

321000%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

320800%

#368

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

400000%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#385

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

100%

#386

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#387

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

100%

#388

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

100%

#389

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200A.

Insight	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%)	✅Leading raw performance (+50%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 6200A Benchmark Check

GeForce4 Ti 4800 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200A and GeForce4 Ti 4800

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
G3D Mark Score	4	6+50%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS	1.345 TFLOPS+86%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	24	60+150%
L1 Cache	192 KB	960 KB+400%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has 512 MB. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce 6200A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
DirectX	9.0c+11%	8.1
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	2.1+62%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: PureVideo vs No.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 Ti 4800
TDP	33W-87%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	216mm
Height	100mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 6200A launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 6200A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).