Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce3 Ti 500

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce 6200A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 6200A
0.125 GB 33
4
+33.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090
GeForce3 Ti 500
0.5 GB 575
3
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce3 Ti 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce3 Ti 500
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce3 Ti 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200A

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 575W, a 542W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 183mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce3 Ti 500

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • ❌1642.4% higher power demand at 575W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 6200A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce3 Ti 500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce3 Ti 500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 6200A still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce3 Ti 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce3 Ti 500

The GeForce3 Ti 500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 3 — the GeForce 6200A leads by 33.3%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce3 Ti 500 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 21,760 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 500). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2407 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
Maxwell
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384
21760+5567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS+14401%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2407 MHz+156%
ROPs
8
176+2100%
TMUs
24
680+2733%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
21.3 MB+11111%
L2 Cache
1 MB
96 MB+9500%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 carries 512 MB. GeForce3 Ti 500 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 500. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 96 MB (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce3 Ti 500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
96 MB+9500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 8.1 (GeForce3 Ti 500). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
DirectX
9.0c+11%
8.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1+40%
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs None (GeForce3 Ti 500). Decoder: PureVideo vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce3 Ti 500).

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo
MPEG-2
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce3 Ti 500's 575W — a 178.3% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (GeForce3 Ti 500). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 183mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
TDP
33W-94%
575W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
183mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200A came in at $0, while the GeForce3 Ti 500 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce 6200A was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.0 (GeForce3 Ti 500) — the GeForce 6200A offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 500 (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 6200AGeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP
$0-100%
$349
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.0
Codename
GM108
GB202
Release
March 13 2015
January 30 2025
Ranking
#810
#3
Search GeForce 6200A on AmazonSearch GeForce3 Ti 500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.