Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9200 SE

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce 6200A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum

GeForce 6200A
0.125 GB 33
4
+33.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4090
RADEON 9200 SE
0.25 GB 55
3
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 370
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce 6200A
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
RADEON 9200 SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200A

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 55W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

RADEON 9200 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • ❌66.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 6200A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9200 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, and 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 6200A still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6200A vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the GeForce 6200A leads by 33.3%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
Maxwell
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+1955%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2900 MHz+208%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
160+567%
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6200A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. RADEON 9200 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
DirectX
9.0c+11%
8.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1+62%
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: PureVideo vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo
None
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 6200A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 60.

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
TDP
33W-40%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
168mm
Height
100mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
60-8%
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6200A came in at $0, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, GeForce 6200A was 100+% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 6200ARADEON 9200 SE
MSRP
$0-100%
$30
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.1
Codename
GM108
Strix Halo
Release
March 13 2015
January 6 2025
Ranking
#810
#98
Search GeForce 6200A on AmazonSearch RADEON 9200 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.