GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6200A

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6200A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 440 Go 64M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 6200A has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200A

The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce4 440 Go 64M leads by 50%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score	4	6+50%
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7227 TFLOPS+33%	0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+500%	32 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6200A has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M carries 512 MB. GeForce4 440 Go 64M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200A and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce 6200A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX	9.0c+29%	7.0
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	2.1+40%	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: PureVideo vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo	MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 3.1% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
TDP	33W	32W-3%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	100mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-24%	85
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 6200A (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 6200A	GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GM108	GK107
Release	March 13 2015	October 1 2012
Ranking	#810	#903

Search GeForce 6200A on Amazon

Search GeForce4 440 Go 64M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.