
GeForce 6200A vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

GeForce 6200A
Popular choices:

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200A.
| Insight | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200A and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6200A scores 4 and the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 4 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+55% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200A comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has 512 MB. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the GeForce 6200A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c+11% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1+50% | 1.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: PureVideo vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | N/A |
| Decoder | PureVideo | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 107% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 10W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.4+300% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6200A launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 6200A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | Broadway |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #810 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















