GeForce 6200A vs GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce 6200A
Popular choices:
GeForce4 MX 440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 MX 440
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce4 MX 440 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce4 MX 440 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6200A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce4 MX 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6200A offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+25%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+98.4%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce4 MX 440 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6200A and GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce 6200A
The GeForce 6200A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
GeForce4 MX 440
The GeForce4 MX 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200A scores 4 versus the GeForce4 MX 440's 5 — the GeForce4 MX 440 leads by 25%. The GeForce 6200A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce4 MX 440 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200A) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 440). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200A) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4 | 5+25% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 896+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+346% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1575 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200A comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 440 has 65 MB. The GeForce 6200A offers 98.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB+98% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200A) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c+29% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6200A) vs None (GeForce4 MX 440). Decoder: PureVideo vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200A) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 440).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200A draws 33W versus the GeForce4 MX 440's 25W — a 27.6% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200A) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 440). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 25W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 165mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 60°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6200A launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce4 MX 440 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The GeForce 6200A costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 6200A) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 440) — the GeForce 6200A offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce4 MX 440 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 6200A | GeForce4 MX 440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.1 |
| Codename | GM108 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #810 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 6200A and GeForce4 MX 440
