
GeForce4 MX 440SE

GeForce4 Ti 4800
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
2020Why buy it
- ✅GeForce4 Ti 4800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 440SE is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
- ❌30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 20%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+87% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+140% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64+7% | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: No vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | No | No |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-90% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 MX 440SE came in at $0, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 440SE was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 MX 440SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.0 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF100 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #523 | #488 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














