GeForce4 MX 440SE vs Radeon IGP 320M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE vs Radeon IGP 320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 440SE vs Radeon IGP 320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 440SE

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon IGP 320M

2019

Why buy it

✅GeForce4 MX 440SE is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon IGP 320M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 440SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon IGP 320M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce4 MX 440SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce4 MX 440SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon IGP 320M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 440SE vs Radeon IGP 320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE

The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Radeon IGP 320M

The Radeon IGP 320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 440SE leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the Radeon IGP 320M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 1,280 (Radeon IGP 320M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 320M). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+26%	1250 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 440SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 320M.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs None (Radeon IGP 320M). Decoder: No vs None.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	No	None
Codecs		MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the Radeon IGP 320M's 85W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
TDP	25W-71%	85W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	Radeon IGP 320M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Navi 14
Release	August 1 2020	November 13 2019
Ranking	#523	#403

Search GeForce4 MX 440SE on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 320M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.