
GeForce4 MX 440SE

RADEON IGP 350M
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON IGP 350M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON IGP 350M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON IGP 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
2020Why buy it
- β RADEON IGP 350M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 440SE is the less risky modern option long term.
- β Draws 25W instead of 55W, a 30W reduction.
- β More future proof: Turing (2018β2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 6).
- β2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
RADEON IGP 350M
2016Why buy it
- β +20% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- β2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β120% higher power demand at 55W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON IGP 350M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON IGP 350M
The RADEON IGP 350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 6 β the RADEON IGP 350M leads by 20%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the RADEON IGP 350M uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 512 (RADEON IGP 350M). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 350M).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 6+20% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+294% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce4 MX 440SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 350M.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the RADEON IGP 350M's 55W β a 75% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-55% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 165mm | β |
| Height | 100mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 60Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | RADEON IGP 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | β |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Cape Verde |
| Release | August 1 2020 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #523 | #667 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














