GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON 9200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON 9200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 MX 440SE

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 MX 440SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce4 MX 440SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 MX 440SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce4 MX 440SE vs RADEON 9200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE

The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the RADEON 9200's 4 — the GeForce4 MX 440SE leads by 25%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the RADEON 9200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 384 (RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	5+25%	4
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS+310%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+54%	1024 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 440SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 MX 440SE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 carries 256 MB. GeForce4 MX 440SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the RADEON 9200's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 350W (RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	RADEON 9200
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	165mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2+100%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 MX 440SE came in at $0, while the RADEON 9200 launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 440SE was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9200) — the GeForce4 MX 440SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce4 MX 440SE	RADEON 9200
MSRP	$0-100%	$99
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.0
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	Polaris 24
Release	August 1 2020	May 13 2019
Ranking	#523	#898

Search GeForce4 MX 440SE on Amazon

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.