
GeForce4 MX 440SE

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 MX 440SE
2020Why buy it
- ✅GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce4 MX 440SE is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 165mm instead of 216mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5 vs 7).
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅+40% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.
- ❌30.9% longer card at 216mm vs 165mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 MX 440SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 MX 440SE
The GeForce4 MX 440SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 MX 440SE scores 5 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 40%. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is built on Turing while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5 | 7+40% |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+211% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+331% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 440SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.1+16% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: No vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | No | No |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 MX 440SE draws 25W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 440SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-83% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-8% | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 MX 440SE came in at $0, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 440SE was 100+% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce4 MX 440SE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 MX 440SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 MX 440SE (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce4 MX 440SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.0 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF104 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #523 | #683 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














