MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9000

#731

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

108570%

#733

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

98420%

#734

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

98160%

#738

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

89260%

#739

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

88650%

#741

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

100%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

100%

#743

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

80%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

60%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

60%

#746

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

50%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

40%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

40%

#749

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

30%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

30%

#751

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

30%

#752

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

30%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

20%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

10%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

10%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9000 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The RADEON 9000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	RADEON 9000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-25%)	✅Leading raw performance (+25%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 206.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	RADEON 9000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+206.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and RADEON 9000

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	4	5+25%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	800	1024+28%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+430%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	80 KB	256 KB+220%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 has 128 MB. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 40% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	RADEON 9000
TDP	10W-33%	15W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	350W
Power Connector	None	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	0.4+33%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49 and now averages $20. The RADEON 9000 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 offers 200% better value. The RADEON 9000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).