MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9000

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9000

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
······

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 5).
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

  • +25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 50% higher power demand at 15W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 25% in PassMark G3D (5 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the RADEON 9000 leads by 25%. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
4
5+25%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
800
1024+28%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
5.939 TFLOPS+430%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
256 KB+220%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 2 MB (RADEON 9000) — the RADEON 9000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 40% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9000
TDP
10W-33%
15W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.4+33%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 came in at $0, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY/RADEON 9000RADEON 9000
MSRP
$0-100%
$49
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.1
Codename
Broadway
Strix Point
Release
January 7 2010
July 15 2024
Ranking
#846
#312

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.