Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum

GeForce4 Ti 4800
0.5 GB 250
6
+50.0%
brand logoGeForce 6200A
brand logoGeForce 256
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070
MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
0.5 GB 10
4
0.0%
brand logoRADEON 7500
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON 9000
brand logoRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
brand logoRadeon R9 Fury
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌2400% higher power demand at 250W vs 10W.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 10W instead of 250W, a 240W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
  • ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 scores 6 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is built on Fermi while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score
6+50%
4
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480
800+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.345 TFLOPS+20%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
60+50%
40
L1 Cache
960 KB+1100%
80 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX
8.1
8.1
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
1.3
1.4+8%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: No vs MPEG-2.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Encoder
No
N/A
Decoder
No
MPEG-2
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 draws 250W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 184.6% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 216mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP
250W
10W-96%
Recommended PSU
350W
0W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
216mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-7%
70
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 came in at $399, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0. On MSRP, MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs Infinity (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value.

FeatureGeForce4 Ti 4800MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
MSRP
$399
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.0
Infinity
Codename
GF100
Broadway
Release
March 26 2010
January 7 2010
Ranking
#488
#846
Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 on AmazonSearch MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.