GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs Quadro FX 500/FX 600
GeForce4 Ti 4800
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is positioned at rank 384 and the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is on rank 425, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 Ti 4800.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 255.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+255.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 Ti 4800 and Quadro FX 500/FX 600
GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 scores 6 versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 8+33% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+100% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS+116% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 80+33% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 500/FX 600's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 189W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.5 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 400% better value. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-11% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.5+400% |
| Codename | GF100 | GT200B |
| Release | March 26 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #488 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce4 Ti 4800 and Quadro FX 500/FX 600
