
GeForce4 Ti 4800

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 scores 6 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is built on Fermi while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 7+17% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+67% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.345 TFLOPS+80% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60+25% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+150% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: No vs No.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | No | No |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 draws 250W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 50% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 216mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 216mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 came in at $399, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE was 25.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE offers 0% better value.
| Feature | GeForce4 Ti 4800 | GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $299-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GF100 | GF104 |
| Release | March 26 2010 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #488 | #683 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













