
GeForce FX 5200LE

GeForce4 Ti 4800
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Cyberpunk 2077

Dead by Daylight
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200LE
2025Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $356 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 982.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($43 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 575W vs 250W.
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 575W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 7).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌827.9% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$43 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% longer card at 216mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200LE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200LE
The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200LE scores 7 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200LE leads by 16.7%. The GeForce FX 5200LE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7+17% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+4433% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+7692% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+267% | 48 |
| TMUs | 680+1033% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+2166% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+12700% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200LE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce FX 5200LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+12700% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+11% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: No vs No.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | No | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200LE draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 78.8% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 250W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200LE came in at $43, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200LE was 89.2% cheaper ($356 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5200LE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce FX 5200LE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200LE (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200LE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $43-89% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GB202 | GF100 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #3 | #488 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














